Bristol Water performance in 2018/19

Landscape scene
Dark Cloud Dark Cloud Dark Cloud Dark Cloud Dark Cloud
Raindrop
Raindrop
Raindrop
Raindrop
Raindrop
Raindrop
Raindrop
Raindrop
Raindrop
Raindrop
Hot Air Balloon Hot Air Balloon
Security
of Supply
Index (SOSI)
Raw water
quality
Biodiversity
index
Population at risk
of asset failure
Turbidity at our
treatment works
Emergency
maintenance
Negative water
quality contacts
Customer contacts
about bills
Hosepipe ban
frequency
Percentage of customers
in water poverty
Low pressure
Customer water
consumption
Level of
metering
Customer satisfaction
General satisfaction
from surveys
Total carbon
emissions
Bursts
Waste disposal
compliance
Compliance with water
quality standards
Leakage
Supply interruptions
Ease of contact
Value for money
Average water bill
  • Key
  • Target Missed
  • Target Met
  • No Target

Average water bill

keyboard_arrow_right
2019/20:
189 £/year

Definition

keyboard_arrow_right

Each year we set our charges for our services based either on how much water our customers use (for a metered charge) or the rateable value (RV) of their property (for an unmetered charge). This figure is the average amount paid by each of our customers for their water bill, although as many factors determine individual households’ bills, customers’ bills may be higher or lower than this average figure. This does not include the charges for sewerage services which are calculated separately by Wessex Water, but included within a combined bill for our customers.

Additional information

keyboard_arrow_right

Customers can compare our average annual water bill against other companies in the industry here.

Biodiversity index

keyboard_arrow_right
Target:
17,652 index points
Actual:
17,668 index points
Target met?
Yes

Definition

keyboard_arrow_right

We monitor our protection and enhancement of the natural environment through an innovative approach that we have called the biodiversity index.  This quantifies the environmental value of our sites and creates a "direction of travel" for the way we manage our assets, helping us to protect and enhance the natural environment by using the index to quantify the impact of our actions on the broader environment. It is measured by the cumulative hectares and meters of habitat (e.g. hedges) and the quality of this habitat.

Commentary

keyboard_arrow_right

There has been an improving trend in our biodiversity since we created this measure in 2014-15. This increase in the Biodiversity Index score demonstrates how Bristol Water is delivering habitat improvements and enhancements on company land holdings. The habitat value of our sites has been improved by projects and delivered in partnership with Bristol Water and different conservation organisations. The areas of work that have improved this year include:

  • Chew Stoke Pumping Station, River Restoration: a significant change to this site is the relocation of the compensation flow (water outfall) upstream to re-wet a previously silted section of river. This new flow in combination with in-stream work to improve water quality has returned a river habitat, ready for recolonization of plants and animals.
  • Urbanbuzz and Bristol Waters pollinator banks: Working in partnership with the national conservation charity Buglife, Bristol Water is changing the way it manages some of its covered reservoir grasslands. By planting additional native wildflowers and wild grasses, and changing the grass cutting routine to twice a year will enable grasses and flowers to grow. This vital food source is being provided for our urban pollinators with the vision that the populations of bees and butterflies will increase across the city of Bristol.

Additional information

keyboard_arrow_right

Customers can find our more information on what we are doing in our local communities here, here and here.

Bursts

keyboard_arrow_right
Target:
950 burst pipes
Actual:
1,074 burst pipes
Target met?
No

Definition

keyboard_arrow_right

This is the total number of burst pipes recorded in the year. A burst pipe is the most common cause of loss of water supply.

Commentary

keyboard_arrow_right

There have been two significant weather events that have impacted the number of reported bursts. Following the cold spell in March 2018 there was a large number of burst mains which were detected and repaired over the first three months of the reporting year. This was then followed by the hot dry summer resulting in higher water demands and ground movement which caused a large number of bursts to occur. We are undertaking more proactive mains replacements in 2019/20.

Additional information

keyboard_arrow_right

Further information on incidents going on in your area, including information on any burst mains, can be found here.

Customers can compare our performance on bursts against other companies in the industry here.

Compliance with water quality standards

keyboard_arrow_right

Also known as:

Mean zonal compliance (MZC)

Target:
100%
Actual:
99.99%
Target met?
No

Definition

keyboard_arrow_right

Drinking water must meet strict standards that ensure it is safe to drink and the quality is acceptable to consumers. This is a water quality compliance measure based on a series of 39 parameters (e.g. levels of lead, nitrate levels etc.) determined by the Drinking Water Inspectorate. It is calculated based on sampling each parameter at supply points and customer taps in a number of specified zones.

Commentary

keyboard_arrow_right

Our Water Quality team collects samples 365 days a year from across our 2,400 square kilometre supply area to ensure we comply with the sampling regime, with no exemptions applicable for example for weather conditions. The sampling schedule is aligned to a sophisticated computer-controlled programme so that water quality is checked right from source to customers' taps. Although the target of 100% for Mean Zonal Compliance (MZC) has not been achieved this year, our performance at 99.99% reflects the highest level of compliance we have achieved in the past five years, is still likely to be a leading level of performance when compared across the industry and is representative of the high quality of water supplied to our customers.

Additional information

keyboard_arrow_right

Customers can learn more about the issues that may affect your water quality here.

Customers can compare our performance on water quality standards against other companies in the industry here.

Customer satisfaction

keyboard_arrow_right

Also known as:

Service incentive mechanism (SIM)

Target:
87.0 SIM score (out of 100)
Actual:
84.7 SIM score (out of 100)
Target met?
No

Definition

keyboard_arrow_right

This is the measure used by the economic regulator of the water sector, Ofwat, for comparing the customer service performance of water companies in England and Wales. It includes quantitative measures of the numbers of complaints and unwanted contacts that companies receive and performance in handling telephone contacts. It also includes a survey of customers’ views on the service provided.

Commentary

keyboard_arrow_right

Our performance over the year has been divided; the first six months (from April to September 2018) saw poorer performance due to increased contacts in relation to poor pressure caused by excess demand in the long hot summer. The second half of the year has, encouragingly, seen a significant reduction in written complaints. This has been as a result of extra focus, training and ways of working to understand the causes of dissatisfaction. A key campaign ‘in their shoes’ has begun to encourage all staff to consider the customers’ expectations and end every interaction asking the customer for feedback. In addition, we continue to invest in wider transformation and new technology as part of our drive towards our long term vision for being the number one company for customer service.

Additional information

keyboard_arrow_right

Customers can compare our performance on customer service against other companies in the industry here.

Ease of contact

keyboard_arrow_right
Target:
>96.5%
Actual:
91.4%
Target met?
No

Definition

keyboard_arrow_right

This is the percentage of our customers who consider that we are easy to contact over the phone.

Commentary

keyboard_arrow_right

The insight we gain from this survey tells us that customers rate their satisfaction on the whole, experience rather than just the phone call. Therefore to succeed in this measure we need to improve all aspects of the customer journey for our customers contacting us via the phone to our operational contact centre. We have as a result implemented a number of changes this year to help improve the customer experience, including customer journey mapping, additional resource to create a customer care team, the increase use of real time feedback and the launch of our company values. As we move into 2019/20 we have a number of projects underway to improve answering our customer’s enquiries right first time, these projects focus on training, IT improvements and ways of working.

Additional information

keyboard_arrow_right

Customers can find more information about how to contact us (whatever the problem) here.

Emergency maintenance

keyboard_arrow_right

Also known as:

Unplanned maintenance events

Target:
3,976 events
Actual:
2,913 events
Target met?
Yes

Definition

keyboard_arrow_right

The total number of unplanned maintenance events occurring throughout the year (at our treatment works, pumping stations and service reservoir), as a result of equipment failure or reduced asset performance.

Commentary

keyboard_arrow_right

Unplanned events mean potential interruptions to the treatment and supply of clean and wholesale water. We use the information from the work orders to better understand our assets and help to implement appropriate measures to ensure reliability.  Effective maintenance and management of assets using such information allows us to run our plant in a resilient manner; the more we can reduce the occurrence of unplanned events on our treatment works the more reliable the supply of water. The more we can reduce the occurrence of unplanned events on our treatment works the more reliable the supply of water and we have again outperformed in this area.

Hosepipe ban frequency

keyboard_arrow_right
Target:
10.2 days/year
Actual:
3.1 days/year
Target met?
Yes

Definition

keyboard_arrow_right

This measures the likelihood in any one year that temporary usage restrictions, such as on the use of hosepipes, will be implemented. It is reported as the number of expected days of restriction in the year. The commitment is based on the assumption that a restriction would last for five months (153 days), and that we have a one-in-fifteen year probability of an interruption: 153 / 15 = 10.2 expected days.

Commentary

keyboard_arrow_right

We managed our water resources very carefully during 2018/19, reducing the amount of water we took from the Mendip reservoirs and increasing the amount taken from the River Severn. This resilience allowed us to maintain a low risk of water restrictions, despite very dry and hot summer weather that was experienced. As a result, for the fourth consecutive year, we have reported a hosepipe ban risk frequency that is better than our target. It has been 29 years since we last introduced a hosepipe ban (in 1990).

Additional information

keyboard_arrow_right

Further information on implementing temporary use bans (including hosepipe bans) and the risk of a drought, can be found on our website here.

Leakage

keyboard_arrow_right
Target:
44.0 mega litres per day
Actual:
41.7 mega litres per day
Target met?
Yes

Definition

keyboard_arrow_right

Water is supplied to customers’ homes through thousands of kilometres of underground pipes. For various reasons, including ground movement and degradation of materials, pipes can leak and some water is lost between the treatment works and the home.  This measure is the amount of water that enters the distribution system but is not delivered to customers because it is lost from either the company’s or customers’ pipes.

Commentary

keyboard_arrow_right

Our leakage levels were exceptionally high when the reporting year began, due to the increased bursts associated with the ‘beast from the east’ extreme freeze-thaw weather in late February and early March 2018. No sooner had we started to reduced leakage than a long, hot and dry summer started. This resulted in stress on our network due to higher demand for water from our customers and ground movement around our pipes, ultimately leafing to higher than normal numbers of burst mains and leaks. In response to the events of the summer and our performance in 2017/18 a new leakage strategy was developed; we introduced additional leakage inspectors and prioritised the largest leak repairs to ensure these were fixed more quickly. As a result of this new strategy we are now detecting and fixing twice the number of leaks compared to last year.

During 2017/18 we agreed with Ofwat a number of changes to how we report on our performance, including on leakage. Without taking into account technical changes, our leakage performance is 45.8 Ml/day. As this is a higher number than the actual leakage level, we have committed to calculating financial incentives (which reduce customer bills) on this measure of leakage.

Additional information

keyboard_arrow_right

Customers can compare our performance on leakage against other companies in the industry here.

Level of metering

keyboard_arrow_right

Also known as:

Meter penetration

Target:
62.5%
Actual:
56.0%
Target met?
No

Definition

keyboard_arrow_right

As you should only pay for what you use, many people regard water meters as the fairest way to charge for your water services. We encourage our customers to be more efficient in the way they use water by increasing the number of household customers who are billed based on their actual water consumption. We measure this by meter penetration, expressed as the percentage of household customers who have a water meter installed at their property.

Commentary

keyboard_arrow_right

Our performance throughout the year has resulted in a lower than anticipated level of meter penetration, principally due to change of occupancy of properties occurring less than expected and requests for meter optants being less than forecast. Our performance partly arises due to a slower housing market and meter option requests, which means we have more work to do in meter promotion, which we have planned to catch up over 2019 and 2020.

We continue to innovate and introduce targeted metering initiatives, such as our ‘Beat the Bill’ campaign, which started in October 2017, with the aim to help customers reduce the amount of water they use. Since its launch, customers have saved as much as £100 a year and it has helped us find several leaks on customers’ supply pipes. We have run various marketing campaigns through a variety of media channels, such as promoting the benefits of metering via Twitter, Facebook, on our website, in information included on customer bills and on local radio.

Additional information

keyboard_arrow_right

Customers can find out more information on applying for a water meter here.

Low Pressure

keyboard_arrow_right
Target:
69 properties at risk of low pressure
Actual:
61 properties at risk of low pressure
Target met?
Yes

Definition

keyboard_arrow_right

Water pressure determines the water that comes out of our customer’s taps. This is measured as the total number of properties in our supply area which, at the end of the year, have received, and are likely to continue to receive, water pressure below the minimum required level.

Commentary

keyboard_arrow_right

Identifying new properties at risk of low pressure can arise as a consequence of our proactive monitoring of our network or as a consequence of poor pressure complaints raised by customers. We have undertaken remedial work to improve the water pressure available at three locations. This includes properties at Kingswood (via targeted mains renewal), at Glastonbury (by increasing pressure properties on a shared supply following customer complaints) and at Frome (by actively addressing properties that have historically received poor pressure, by increasing pressure available on a shared supply).

Additional information

keyboard_arrow_right

Customers can compare our performance on low water pressure against other companies in the industry here.

Customer contacts about bills

keyboard_arrow_right

Also known as:

Negative billing contacts

Target:
2,240 contacts/year
Actual:
1,595 contacts/year
Target met?
Yes

Definition

keyboard_arrow_right

This is how we measure the number calls we have received that a customer would prefer not to make, in the sense that they are dissatisfied because they are experiencing a problem or concern, are making a repeat or chase call, or want to complain.

Commentary

keyboard_arrow_right

Our performance indicates that we have established a good level of customer experience and understanding of why our customers are contacting us. This has been achieved by updates to the website, improving the online self-service options, a review and update of the metered bill and continuous improvement in response to customer feedback.

Additional information

keyboard_arrow_right

Customers can find out more information on their water bill here and further information about online billing here.

Negative water quality contacts

keyboard_arrow_right
Target:
2,275 contacts/year
Actual:
1,934 contacts/year
Target met?
Yes

Definition

keyboard_arrow_right

It is important that our water not only meets stringent standards but is also good to drink. We know that the taste and appearance of our customers’ tap water is something which they value highly. We therefore measure the total number of customer contacts (telephone, letter and email) about the appearance, taste and odour of the water for the previous calendar year.

Commentary

keyboard_arrow_right

Although the overall number of customer contacts about water quality has however increased compared to last year, we are pleased that we have outperformed against our target for this year. This increase is associated with an increased activity on the mains network due to the following:

  • Contacts about the appearance of the water are commonly associated with the suspension of iron particles in water mains due to a change in flow or pressure i.e. a disturbance of the water main. During 2018 activity on the network has increased, with the ‘Beast form the East;’ causing a significant increase in bursts requiring repair. Put simply, contacts about water quality are to be expected when bursts occur, as the re-routing of water, to ensure a continuous supply of water to our customers, can have a short-term impact on the appearance of the water that comes out of your tap; and
  • Our increased activities in reducing leakage, which had a similar effect to the approach to fixing bursts.

Additional information

keyboard_arrow_right

Customers can learn more about the issues that may affect your water quality here.

Customers can compare our performance on appearance contacts against other companies in the industry here and our performance on taste/odour contacts against other companies in the industry here.

Percentage of customers in water poverty

keyboard_arrow_right
Target:
1.9%
Actual:
0%
Target met?
Yes

Definition

keyboard_arrow_right

This measure is defined as the percentage of customers within our supply area for whom their water bill represents more than 2% of their disposable income, defined as gross income less income tax. This measure allows us to understand the impact of our bills on our customers. To calculate this we use a population analytics model to estimate the gross percentage of customers in water poverty, and then deduct those customers who we support through our Assist social tariff.

Commentary

keyboard_arrow_right

We have again met our target; this measure ensures that we monitor our performance in helping those customers on the lowest incomes and experiencing the most serious financial difficulties by calculating and tracking the percentage of customers in ‘water poverty’.

We offer three discounted tariffs to make sure we help customers who find it hard to pay their water charges, with 15,620 customers receiving assistance through these measures, an increase of 14% over last year:

  • 6,483 households are on our ‘Assist’ social tariff, which offers significant bill discounts to those customers least able to afford their bill, following a means assessment.
  • 2,826 households are on our WaterSure Plus metered tariff, this is for customers in receipt of certain benefits, and are defined by the government as ‘vulnerable’, either because they have a medical condition or a large family.
  • 6,311 customers are on our Pension Credit social tariff. This scheme gives a 20% discount on water bills to customers who live in a household where all members over the age of 18 are in receipt of Pension Credit.

Additional information

keyboard_arrow_right

Customers can find further information and support on the range of social tariffs we have available on our website here.

Customer water consumption

keyboard_arrow_right

Also known as:

Per Capita Consumption (PCC)

Target:
142.8 litres per person per day
Actual:
150.7 litres per person per day
Target met?
No

Definition

keyboard_arrow_right

This is how we measure how much water our customers use every year. It is defined as the average amount of water used by each person each day. By knowing this information, the intention is to encourage behaviours to reduce the amount of water we use, thereby helping customers save money for the future and further adapt to the challenges of climate change.

Commentary

keyboard_arrow_right

We know from continuous engagement activities that our customers on the whole do not wish to see full compulsory metering introduced and we do not have plans to introduce such a programme. This does impact PCC performance. In order to improve on our performance, our household customers receive a seasonal newsletter called Watertalk that offers advice to help reduce water consumption as well as money saving tips. In addition, we also have water saving kits available on request. We have also installed free water fountains in the centre of Bristol and offered a ‘water bar’ at local festivals and events, to help promote the benefits of water. We do also offer a range of free water saving products that could help our customers maximise the money they can save.

During 2017/18 we agreed with Ofwat a number of changes to how we report on our performance, including on per capita consumption. Without taking into account technical changes, our per capita consumption performance is 148.5 litres per person per day.

Additional information

keyboard_arrow_right

Customers can compare our performance on the average amount of water used by each household each day against other companies in the industry here.

Further information on reducing water consumption, including on finding our more about our wide range of free water saving products, that could help customers save money, can be found here.

Population at risk of asset failure

keyboard_arrow_right

Also known as:

Population in centres >25,000 at risk from asset failure

Target:
9,063 people at risk
Actual:
9,063 people at risk (Southern Resilience Scheme completed)
Target met?
Yes

Definition

keyboard_arrow_right

We aim to provide a resilient supply of water to our customers, all year round. A resilient supply means that we are able to cope with extreme or unusual events, and this is measured by the number of people at risk from the failure of a single source above ground asset, such as a treatment is unable to operate or a contaminated source (in supply areas of more than 25,000 consumers).

Commentary

keyboard_arrow_right

The successful delivery of the Southern Resilience Scheme in March 2018 (a £27m water infrastructure project) has significantly reduced the number of consumers at risk from 288,589 to 9,063 across our supply area including Weston-Super- Mare, Cheddar, Burnham-on-Sea and Glastonbury and the northern part of Bristol. The scheme involved constructing 30 kilometres of new mains to reinforce and support our southern supply area. The scheme means that if there is an emergency we can get our customers’ water supply back much, much quicker.

Raw water quality

keyboard_arrow_right

Also known as:

Raw water quality of sources

Target:
+/-≤10%
Actual:
-14%
Target met?
Yes

Definition

keyboard_arrow_right

The quality of our water sources, particularly in the Mendip lakes, can be impacted due to nutrients and sediment that can enter the watercourses from land and activities in the catchment area of the source. This is an assessment of the quality of our raw water sources that are at risk of deterioration due to increased levels of pesticides and nutrients in their catchments. This is measured as the percentage of the previous reporting period’s baseline aggregate of algal bloom frequency.

Commentary

keyboard_arrow_right

Our catchment management work has resulted in a reduction of algal bloom frequency and reflects a consistent reduction over the last four year. This means that water in our reservoirs will not be as expensive to treat as would have been the case had algal bloom frequency continued to increase as it did between 2010 to 2015. It also means that the ecological condition of the sites will have improved than would have been the case had the algae been allowed to continue to proliferate – this is important as the reservoirs are nationally, and in the case of Chew Valley Reservoir, internationally, designated habitats (known as Sites of Specific Scientific Interest and Special Protection Areas).

Additional information

keyboard_arrow_right

Customers can find further information on our catchment management initiatives here.

General satisfaction from surveys

keyboard_arrow_right
Target:
93%
Actual:
89%
Target met?
No

Definition

keyboard_arrow_right

This measure relates to the percentage of customers responding to our annual satisfaction survey who rate their satisfaction in respect of our service as excellent, very good or good. This is different from our other customer measures as most of the customers surveyed will not have had direct contact with us, apart from receiving their annual bill.

Commentary

keyboard_arrow_right

We have been doing a lot of work to improve the way customers perceive us in 2018/19. For example, our new bill redesign provides a more simplified and accessible design to make it easier for customers to understand as well as promoting additional support services such as our Priority Services. We have also been working to improve our customers’ experiences when we are doing work in their areas and have a dedicated team to keep our digital communication channels updated. We also have a separate team to focus on improving how we implement street works, as customers regularly tell us we should be doing more in this area. We have issued an online panel to complement the findings from the annual survey and understand in more detail what customers’ expectations are around our operational response when we are completing work.

Security of Supply Index (SOSI)

keyboard_arrow_right
Target:
100 Index points
Actual:
100 Index points
Target met?
Yes

Definition

keyboard_arrow_right

One of our customers’ most important requirements is an unrestricted water supply. Our performance of this is measured by the frequency of supply restrictions during periods of water shortages, known as the ‘security of supply index’ (SOSI). This takes into account the supply of water that we have available and the demand from our customers, calculated as the proportion of dry weather demand that can be met by the water available for use. If a score of less than 100 is calculated, this would indicate that there is a higher risk of water use restrictions for our customers in that year.

Commentary

keyboard_arrow_right

We have reported a SOSI value of 100 for 2018/19 (and every year to date in AMP6), indicating our customers can expect a sufficient supply of water, with no restrictions during dry weather. This is due to our effective operational management in response to dry weather conditions; we continue to ensure that our supply meets demand.

Additional information

keyboard_arrow_right

Further information on our future plans to take action to to reduce demand for water can be found in our Water Resources Management Plan here.

Supply interruptions

keyboard_arrow_right

Also known as:

Unplanned customer minutes lost

Target:
12.5 mins/property/year
Actual:
14.7 mins/property/year
Target met?
No

Definition

keyboard_arrow_right

This measures the total number of minutes that customers have been without a supply of water in the year, through unplanned interruptions, divided by the total number of properties served by the company in the year. Keeping water flowing is an essential part of our role as a water company and by using this measurement we aim to minimise supply interruptions to our customers.

Commentary

keyboard_arrow_right

During the year supply interruptions have been directly impacted by two significant weather events that led to an increase in the number of bursts and leaks on our network. The year began with increased bursts and leakage associated with the ‘beast from the east’ extreme freeze-thaw weather. There was further stress to the network during the hot, dry summer, which was characterised by increased demand and ground movement associated with exceptional levels of soil moisture deficit. Furthermore, a supply interruption event at Frenchay in November 2018 added 2.74 minutes to our reported performance.

Additional information

keyboard_arrow_right

Customers can compare our performance on supply interruptions against other companies in the industry here.

Total carbon emissions

keyboard_arrow_right
Target:
22 kg/CO2e/person
Actual:
23 kg/CO2e/person
Target met?
No

Definition

keyboard_arrow_right

This represents the total carbon emissions produced by the Company and contractors working on our behalf. We calculate our carbon emissions through the electrical energy we use in our operations, our consumption of gas and the fuel we use for transport, plant operation and site heating. This equals our annual operational greenhouse gas emissions, expressed in kilograms of CO2 (carbon dioxide) equivalent divided by the population supplied.

Commentary

keyboard_arrow_right

This is impacted by the government’s conversion factors for greenhouse gas reporting. In July 2018 the government released an updated set of Grid Emissions Factors (GEFs). These factors are used to calculate the indirect emission of greenhouse gases from the import and consumption of electricity from the grid. The government’s updated GEF dropped steeply from 2017/18 to 2018/19. This is a direct result of the successive closure and conversions of the UK’s coal fire power stations, matched by an increase in low carbon energy sources (primarily natural gas) and renewables. The hot and dry summer of 2018 however lead to an increase in energy consumption in our supply area over the period.

We are working to implement a number of substantial projects over the coming year that will directly offset the import of energy from the grid and lower overall energy consumption, including:

  • The role out of an automated pump scheduling system, that will look to optimise individual pumps, pump-sets and whole source selection;
  • Installation of solar panels at key sites;
  • Installation of a gas powered generator at Purton treatment works.

Additional information

keyboard_arrow_right

Customers can compare our performance on operational greenhouse gas emissions against other companies in the industry here.

Turbidity at our treatment works

keyboard_arrow_right
Target:
0 incidents
Actual:
0 incidents
Target met?
Yes

Definition

keyboard_arrow_right

Turbidity is a measure of the cloudiness of water, normally caused by suspended minerals. It is an important water quality control parameter at our water treatment works. Factors such as turbidity affect the effectiveness of disinfection.

Commentary

keyboard_arrow_right

Water quality is at the heart of our monitoring and maintenance of our treatment works, to ensure high standards are maintained in our assets. We have a long track record of achieving zero turbidity events. For 2018/19 we have again met our target, which means we have again been successful in ensuring consistently good treated water enters our supply system.

Additional information

keyboard_arrow_right

Customers can learn more about the issues that may affect your water quality here.

Value for money

keyboard_arrow_right
Target:
72%
Actual:
68%
Target met?
No

Definition

keyboard_arrow_right

This measure relates to the percentage of customers who consider that we provide good value for money.

Commentary

keyboard_arrow_right

Despite having below average customer water bills compared to the rest of the industry, our performance for this year has declined. We have a continuous improvement action plan in place with our operation contact centre, which is focusing on training around resolution at the first point of contact. This is regularly mentioned as a reason for dissatisfaction in this measure, so we do except it to improve in the near future.

Waste disposal compliance

keyboard_arrow_right
Target:
100%
Actual:
98%
Target met?
No

Definition

keyboard_arrow_right

This measures the number of Bristol Water samples taken of discharged trade effluent (poisonous, noxious or polluting matter) from designated Company sample points that comply with the consent requirements in the Environment Agency (EA) permits. Trade effluent, if not controlled, can have harmful effects, which include harm to the environment, particularly our surrounding rivers, streams and estuaries.

Commentary

keyboard_arrow_right

Although we were unable to meet our target for this year, almost 98% of the samples collected were fully compliant with the discharge consent conditions. We have plans for a remedial scheme for the Reed Bed discharge at Barrow to mitigate the risk of manganese failures, which historically have presented a seasonal challenge to compliance. Currently we have interim measures in place until the remedial scheme is complete. In addition, the installation of the new mixer in the sludge holding tank at Purton has proved effective and no compliance failures have been reported this year from in-house discharge monitoring. We are working closely with the Environment Agency to assess the feasibility of compliance with the limits of the new discharge consent for Blagdon fisheries. The consent came into force from 1 February 2018 and after a two-year review period the feasibility of compliance will be decided.

close

Loading...

Also Known As:

Generating...

The content is loading.

The content you requested is loading, please wait...