Bristol Water mid-year performance in 2020/21

Landscape scene
Dark Cloud Dark Cloud Dark Cloud Dark Cloud Dark Cloud
Raindrop
Raindrop
Raindrop
Raindrop
Raindrop
Raindrop
Raindrop
Raindrop
Raindrop
Raindrop
Hot Air Balloon Hot Air Balloon
River abstractions
Raw water
quality
Biodiversity
index
Network resilience
Turbidity at our
treatment works
Emergency
maintenance
Customer contacts
about water quality
– appearance
Customer contacts
about water quality
– taste and smell
Total customer
complaints
Percentage of customers
in water poverty
Low pressure
Customer water
consumption
Level of metering
Customer satisfaction
with service
Devloper satisfaction
with service
Bursts
Waste disposal
compliance
Compliance with water
quality standards
Leakage
Supply interruptions
Value for money
Average water bill
Unplanned outage
Drought restrictions
Priority services register
Unbilled properties
Percentage of
satisfied vulnerable
customers
WINEP compliance
WINEP delivery
Local community
satisfaction
  • Key:
  • No target
  • On track to meet target *
    * outperformance payment may apply
  • On track to meet target
  • Not on track to meet target
  • Not on track to meet target *
    * underperformance payment may apply

Average water bill

keyboard_arrow_right
2020/21:
177 £/year

Definition

keyboard_arrow_right

Each year we set our charges, informed by the price controls that are determined every five year by the economic regulator of the water sector, Ofwat. Price controls were set for the period between 2020-25 following reviews that started in 2019. Charges for our services are either based on how much water our customers use (for a metered charge) or the rateable value (RV) of their property (for an unmetered charge). Few customers have an average bill as many factors determine individual households’ bills. In addition, most customers will receive a combined water and sewerage bill – but the charge for the sewerage service reflects the levels set by Wessex Water. Comparing the average water bill level is however a useful tool for customers to benchmark our charges against our performance and against the average charges of other companies in the water sector.

Additional information

keyboard_arrow_right

Customers can compare our average annual water bill against other companies in the industry here.

Biodiversity index

keyboard_arrow_right
Mid-year actual:
17,648 Index points
Year-end target:
17,668 Index points
Year-end target on track?
Yes

Definition

keyboard_arrow_right

The aim of this performance commitment is to quantify enhancements we have made to the natural environment across our sites. It is measured on the cumulative hectares and metres of habitat (for example, grassland or hedges) and the quality of this habitat across our sites.

Performance

keyboard_arrow_right

Our mid-year position demonstrates how the natural environment and the company’s natural assets require continuous monitoring and maintenance to balance the risks and issues of climate change, invasive species, operational activities, and natural succession of habitats.

Our biodiversity has deteriorated since the end of March 2020 following the identification of an Invasive Non-Native Species within the Reedbed assets at Chew Valley Lake. The invasive plant species, Himalayan Balsam, was identified and surveyed at locations around Chew Valley Lake during September 2020. The extent of the growth of this invasive plant directly impacts the condition of the Wetland Reedbed/Swamp assets.

Over the remainder of this year, we have identified a Tree Planting opportunity at our Axbridge Treatment Works. At this site we have an opportunity to convert a lesser valued natural asset (semi-improved neutral grassland) to a higher valued natural asset (broadleaved plantation parkland).

Additional information

keyboard_arrow_right

Customers can find out how our social contract initiatives are contributing to biodiversity improvements across our supply area here.

Bursts

keyboard_arrow_right

Also known as:

Mains repairs

Mid-year actual:
49.1 repairs per 1,000km of mains
Year-end target:
138.4 repairs per 1,000km of mains
Year-end target on track?
Yes

Definition

keyboard_arrow_right

The aim of this performance commitment is to ensure that our below-ground water mains network are maintained and improved for the benefit of current and future generations. It is reported as the number of mains repairs recorded in the year per thousand kilometres of the entire water main network (excluding communication and supply pipes). A burst pipe is the most common cause of loss of water supply.

Performance

keyboard_arrow_right

We are pleased to be on track to meet our target for this year. The number of repairs has been managed through targeted mains replacement and the development of ‘Continuous Water Supply’ techniques (such as live clamp repairs) and a ‘Safe Control of Operations’ framework, which focuses on minimising stresses on the network wherever possible.

Additional information

keyboard_arrow_right

Further information on incidents going on in your area, including information on any burst mains, can be found here.

Customers can compare our performance on bursts against other companies in the industry here.

Compliance with water quality standards

keyboard_arrow_right

Also known as:

Water quality compliance

Mid-year actual:
0.29 CRI
Year-end target:
0 CRI
Year-end target on track?
No

Definition

keyboard_arrow_right

The aim of this performance commitment is to ensure we fully comply with our statutory obligations on drinking water quality, which helps to promote customer confidence that their water is clean and safe to drink. It is measured by the Compliance Risk Index (CRI), which illustrates the risk to consumers arising from compliance water sample failures and considers the significance of the parameter, the cause of the failure, the Company’s investigation and the location of the failure within the supply system. A CRI score is calculated for every individual compliance failure at water supply zones, supply points and treatment works, and service reservoirs.

Performance

keyboard_arrow_right

We are pleased that our performance indicates a high level of water quality performance.

Our CRI to date largely consists of isolated bacteriological failures at service reservoirs and customer properties where our investigations concluded that they were not representative of the water quality being supplied to consumers and that there was no wider issue within the network. This suggests that the risk to our customers from water compliance sample failures causing an impact on their drinking water has been minimal, but we are never complacent in aiming for zero failures and thoroughly test the root cause of problems and potential risks.

Additional information

keyboard_arrow_right

Customers can learn more about the issues that may affect your water quality here.

Customers can compare our performance on water quality standards against other companies in the industry here.

Customer contacts about water quality – appearance

keyboard_arrow_right
Mid-year actual:
0.82 Contacts/ 1,000 population
Year-end target:
0.83 Contacts/ 1,000 population
Year-end target on track?
No

Definition

keyboard_arrow_right

The aim of this performance commitment is to reduce water quality contacts made by our customers, relating to the appearance of their water. It is measured as the number of times we are contacted by consumers due to the drinking water not being clear, reported per 1,000 population.

Performance

keyboard_arrow_right

Customer contacts for discoloured (orange/brown) water remain the biggest contributor to appearance contacts. This discolouration can be primarily attributed to the disturbance of harmless iron sediments within the mains network. Our systematic flushing programme has proven to be effective as a first stage intervention in removing iron sediment before it can cause a problem (to the extent that it then results in customers feeling the need to contact us about the appearance of their water).

The performance so far in 2020 is similar to previous years but is not on track to deliver the reduction in our business plan. There is no single cause, but the most significant factors that have prevented our improved network performance from achieving this target has been third party use of hydrants and standpipes as well as individual burst main events.

Additional information

keyboard_arrow_right

Customers can learn more about the issues that may affect your water quality here.

Customers can compare our performance on appearance contacts against other companies in the industry here.

Customer contacts about water quality – taste and smell

keyboard_arrow_right
Mid-year actual:
0.28 Contacts/ 1,000 population
Year-end target:
0.40 Contacts/ 1,000 population
Year-end target on track?
Yes

Definition

keyboard_arrow_right

The aim of this performance commitment is to reduce water quality contacts made by our customers, relating to the taste and odour of their water. It is measured as the number of times we are contacted by consumers due to the taste and odour of their drinking water, reported per 1,000 population.

Performance

keyboard_arrow_right

Historically, the majority of taste and odour contacts are associated with problems that develop within internal domestic plumbing systems. Updates to our website have helped to improve the information available to customers. As our network has been working well, this has also contributed to a reduction in taste and odour contacts.

Additional information

keyboard_arrow_right

Customers can learn more about the issues that may affect your water quality here.

Customers can compare our performance on taste/odour contacts against other companies in the industry here.

Customer satisfaction

keyboard_arrow_right

Also known as:

C-MeX

Mid-year actual:
7th in industry
Year-end target:
Top 5 in industry
Year-end target on track?
Yes

Definition

keyboard_arrow_right

The aim of this performance commitment is to ensure we improve the experience we provide to residential customers, by improving both the overall customer experience and our handling of customer contacts. This is measured via the customer measure of experience (C-MeX) which is a measure of customer satisfaction. Our C-MeX score is calculated as the weighted average of customer satisfaction scores from customer service and customer experience surveys, with surveys undertaken in four ‘waves’ throughout the year.

Performance

keyboard_arrow_right

We were pleased that our C-MeX scores in wave 1 were the highest customer satisfaction rates we have achieved. Likewise, we were pleased that both our billing and operational scores were higher in wave 1 than in 2019/20, which underlines our customers’ approval of the quality and reliability of the services we provide. In wave 2 our customer satisfaction scores increased to a level that ranks us at fifth place in the industry. Over the first half of 2020/21 we are likely to be ranked 7th overall.

We are undertaking a range of initiatives over the next few months to improve our customers’ perceptions, some of which revolve around embedding our new branding and publicising it, as well as promoting our educational activity and local community projects, such as the Bristol Water Foundation and the Water Efficiency campaign.

Additional information

keyboard_arrow_right

Customers can compare our performance on customer service against other companies in the industry here.

Developer satisfaction with service

keyboard_arrow_right

Also known as:

D-MeX

Mid-year actual:
1st in industry
Year-end target:
Top 5 in industry
Year-end target on track?
Yes

Definition

keyboard_arrow_right

The aim of this performance commitment is to ensure we improve the experience we deliver to developer services (new connections) customers, including property developers, self-lay providers (SLPs) and those with new appointments and variations (NAVs). This is measured via the developer services measure of experience (D-MeX), a measure of customer satisfaction. At the end of the year D-MeX scores for all water companies in England and Wales in a league table. Our aim in 2020/21 is to deliver a level of service that results in a ‘top 5’ position in the industry.

Performance

keyboard_arrow_right

In the first half of 2020/21, our D-MeX score appears to be the best in the industry. We have a dedicated team which is responsible for processing applications from developers, SLPs and NAVs and we have worked to create a closer working relationship with developers and self-lay providers. We have made significant improvements in timeliness and effectiveness of our response to these customers and we publish information that makes it easier for developers and SLPs to understand our costs and approach to developer service.

Additional information

keyboard_arrow_right

Customers can compare our performance on developer services against other companies in the industry here.

Drought restrictions

keyboard_arrow_right

Also known as:

Risk of severe restrictions in a drought

Mid-year actual:
n/a
Year-end target:
38% of population at risk
Year-end target on track?
No

Definition

keyboard_arrow_right

One of our customers’ most important requirements is an unrestricted water supply and yet, during exceptionally dry periods, customers may experience restrictions to their water usage and/or supply. For example, temporary interruptions to supply. This measure looks at the percentage of our customers at risk of the most severe restrictions being introduced once every 200 years. The aim is to measure the resilience of our Company to severe water restrictions in a 1-in-200 drought and to incentivise us to make improvements to this level of resilience in the short and longer term.

Performance

keyboard_arrow_right

As this measure is based on annual data, a mid-year value is not applicable.

Due to the integrated nature of our water sources, we operate a single water resource zone. The sensitivity of the Bristol Water supply demand balance, and the fact we only have one water resource zone, significantly impacts this metric. Due to the dry weather in summer 2020/21, we are likely to fail this measure for the year, because it measures the risk in 2045 if we took no action in a severe drought. This industry standard metric is therefore of limited relevance to performance today.

We constantly monitor our water resource position and despite the hot dry spell over the last few years, we have managed our resources to ensure customer supplies are maintained without the need for any drought restrictions. If prolonged dry weather were to continue, our close monitoring of the resource position would enable us to identify when a drought is developing and ensure that steps are taken early to help reduce demand for water and manage the effects of drought.

If we were to experience a drought in reality the risk to our customers of experiencing severe drought restrictions would be reduced via the implementation of temporary use bans, sometimes called a “hosepipe ban”, whereby restrictions are put in place on a number of customer activities, such as watering their gardens, cleaning their cars or watering their plants using a hosepipe. Such measures have however not been introduced by Bristol Water since 1990.

Additional information

keyboard_arrow_right

Further information on our drought plans can be found on our website here.

Further information on our future plans to take action to to reduce demand for water can be found in our Water Resources Management Plan here.

Emergency maintenance

keyboard_arrow_right

Also known as:

Unplanned maintenance – non-infrastructure

Mid-year actual:
1,591 jobs
Year-end target:
3,272 jobs
Year-end target on track?
Yes

Definition

keyboard_arrow_right

The aim of this performance commitment is to ensure that the health of all water non-infrastructure assets is appropriately maintained and improved. It is measured as the total number of unplanned non-infrastructure maintenance jobs, required as a result of equipment failure or reduced asset performance. It typically relates to jobs identified at our treatment works, pumping stations and service reservoirs.

Performance

keyboard_arrow_right

Unplanned events mean potential interruptions to the treatment and supply of clean and wholesome water. The more we can reduce the occurrence of unplanned events on our treatment works the more reliable the supply of water; this results in reduced asset downtime and increased reliability of supply for our customers. We aim to provide the right maintenance and whole life care to our assets to ensure that they are reliable and efficient; our steady performance over the last few years demonstrates that we continue to achieving this balance.

Leakage

keyboard_arrow_right
Mid-year actual:
39.5 Megalitres/ day
Year-end target:
38.2 Megalitres/ day
Year-end target on track?
Yes

Definition

keyboard_arrow_right

Water is supplied to customers’ homes through thousands of kilometres of underground pipes. For various reasons, including ground movement and degradation of materials, pipes can leak and some water is lost between the treatment works and the home.

The aim of this performance commitment is to reduce leakage, which is measured as the amount of water that enters the distribution system but is not delivered to customers because it is lost from either the company’s or customers’ pipes.

Our performance and targets are based on our three-year average performance.

Performance

keyboard_arrow_right

Leakage reduction is consistently a top priority across all our customer research and engagement. It is therefore pleasing that we continue to deliver industry leading levels of leakage reduction. This is despite the fact that we have experienced a complex combination of change of customer usage habits in response to COVID-19, combined with difficult weather conditions in the spring and the summer.

The combination of targeted investment in our network, improved monitoring (leak repairs continue to be monitored so that the largest are targeted as highest priority) and control activities, and our proactive approach to leakage management and leakage reduction initiatives, such as pressure management, continues to see us reduce leakage levels further. Our excellent leakage performance can be attributed to significant effort to reduce leakage on our distribution network with more leakage inspectors deployed, supported with additional technology, whilst working closely with our customers to minimise leakage.

Additional information

keyboard_arrow_right

Customers can compare our performance on leakage against other companies in the industry here.

Level of metering

keyboard_arrow_right

Also known as:

Meter penetration

Mid-year actual:
59.28%
Year-end target:
67.7%
Year-end target on track?
No

Definition

keyboard_arrow_right

Many people regard water meters as the fairest way to charge for water services. We encourage our customers to be more efficient in the way they use water by increasing the number of household customers who are billed based on their actual water consumption. We measure this by meter penetration, expressed as the percentage of household customers who have a water meter installed at their property.

Performance

keyboard_arrow_right

Our performance has traditionally been driven by our meter optant policy (those customers who opt into receiving water via a meter by contacting us to request a meter fitting) and our selective metering policy (whereby we install a meter at a property whenever there is a change of occupier), which are in turn impacted by our information campaigns.

In order to support efforts to control the spread of Covid-19 and protect our customers and employees, we suspended all metering activity in the first half of this year.

Customer demand for meters (meter optants) temporarily dropped, as our customers’ attention was understandably focussed elsewhere. Where customers asked for a meter, but due to COVID-19 we could not fit one, we temporarily provided them with an alternative “assessed” charge instead.

We re-commenced our metering activities as soon as it was safe and legal to do so. However, the continuing uncertainty caused by the pandemic has continued to decrease the number of applications for a meter we receive from our customers.

Additional information

keyboard_arrow_right

Customers can find out more information on applying for a water meter here.

Local community satisfaction

keyboard_arrow_right
Mid-year actual:
n/a
Year-end target:
85%
Year-end target on track?
Yes

Definition

keyboard_arrow_right

The aim of this performance commitment is to improve our contributions to local communities through specified initiatives. It is measured as the percentage of stakeholders who answer “very satisfied’ or ‘fairly satisfied’ to the following question: “How far do you agree that Bristol Water makes a positive contribution to the communities it serves?”

Performance

keyboard_arrow_right

As this measure is based on annual data, a mid-year value is not applicable.

In order to demonstrate to our stakeholders that we have improved our contributions to our local communities, we are undertaking a range of social contract programmes, with specified objectives for the year. Our progress to date can be found on our website and in our Mid-Year Social Contract Benefit and Transparency Report, published in December 2020.

Additional information

keyboard_arrow_right

Customers can find more about our social contract initiatives here.

Our Mid-Year Social Contract Benefit and Transparency Report can also be found on our website here.

Low Pressure

keyboard_arrow_right

Also known as:

Properties at risk of receiving low pressure

Mid-year actual:
70 properties at risk of low pressure
Year-end target:
65 properties at risk of low pressure
Year-end target on track?
Yes

Definition

keyboard_arrow_right

Water pressure determines the water that comes out of our customers’ taps. This is measured as the total number of properties in our supply area which, at the end of the year, have received, and are likely to continue to receive, water pressure below the minimum required level.

Performance

keyboard_arrow_right

It is unlikely that our customers will experience water pressure below the minimum standard; since the end of March 2020 an additional 13 properties, all located in Radstock, have been identified as receiving low pressure. The insufficient pressure has been caused by being on a shared supply pipe (rather than their property receiving water via their own supply pipe). We have plans in place to conduct remedial work in order to address seven of the recently added properties at risk of poor pressure identified in Radstock.

Additional information

keyboard_arrow_right

Customers can compare our performance on low water pressure against other companies in the industry here.

Network resilience

keyboard_arrow_right

Also known as:

Glastonbury Street network resilience

Mid-year actual:
0 months delay to deliver scheme
Year-end target:
0 months delay to deliver scheme
Year-end target on track?
Yes

Definition

keyboard_arrow_right

The aim of this performance commitment is to protect customers should we not deliver the Wells to Glastonbury and Street area mains scheme in Somerset. It is measured as the expected number of months delay to deliver a permanent secondary source of supply to the Glastonbury and Street area, covering a population of approximately 28,000, by 31 March 2025.

Performance

keyboard_arrow_right

The Glastonbury and Street zones are supplied from Cheddar Water Treatment Works via a considerable length of “Critical Main” for which there is no redundancy. This scheme will ensure that 13,000 customers have resilience of supply by providing an additional route of supply to Windmill Hill Reservoir, maintaining the supply of water to Glastonbury and Street in the event that the main supply route is lost or compromised. It also ensures that those customers in Glastonbury and Street would be at a significantly less risk of experiencing water supply interruptions of over 24 hours.

The Wells to Glastonbury and Street area mains scheme in Somerset is expected to be delivered in November 2022.

Percentage of customers in water poverty

keyboard_arrow_right
Mid-year actual:
n/a
Year-end target:
0%
Year-end target on track?
Yes

Definition

keyboard_arrow_right

Water poverty is defined as the percentage of customers within our supply area for whom their water bill represents more than 2% of their disposable income, defined as gross income less income tax. This measure allows us to understand the impact of our bills on our customers. To calculate this we use a population analytics model to estimate the gross percentage of customers in water poverty, and then deduct those customers who we support through our Assist and Pension Credit social tariffs.

Performance

keyboard_arrow_right

As this measure is based on annual data, a mid-year value is not applicable.

We have historically been able to ensure zero percentage of our customers are in water poverty as a result of our focus on increasing the number of customers on our social tariffs. We offer three discounted social tariffs to make sure we can help customers who find it hard to pay their water charges, with 19,755 customers receiving assistance through these measures to date. Below is a breakdown of each scheme and the number of customers currently registered:

  • 8,430 households are on our ‘Assist’ social tariff, which offers significant bill discounts to those customers least able to afford their bill, following a means assessment
  • 3,177 households are on our ‘Watersure Plus’ metered tariff, this is for customers in receipt of certain benefits, and are defined as ‘vulnerable’, either because they have a medical condition or a large family
  • 8,148 customers are on our ‘Pension Credit Discount’ social tariff. This scheme gives a 20% discount on water bills to customers who live in a household where all members over the age of 18 are in receipt of Pension Credit.

We also know that due to the additional water usage in households, arising from a greater number of people working from home due to COVID-19, some customers will see their metered bills increase. We are working hard to ensure that the financial support we have available for those struggling to pay reaches those eligible.

Additional information

keyboard_arrow_right

Customers can find further information and support on the range of social tariffs we have available on our website here.

Customers can find out how our social contract initiatives are contributing to providing extra social tariff support and debt advice here.

Customer water consumption

keyboard_arrow_right

Also known as:

Per capita consumption (PCC)

Mid-year actual:
150.2 Litres/ person/ day
Year-end target:
147.0 Litres/ person/ day
Year-end target on track?
No

Definition

keyboard_arrow_right

The aim of this performance commitment is to help customers reduce their consumption. It is defined as the average amount of water used by each person each day; the sum of measured household consumption and unmeasured household consumption divided by the total household population.

Our performance and targets are based on our three-year average performance.

Performance

keyboard_arrow_right

This is a challenging target and regretfully, based on our performance to date, we are forecasting to not achieve it for this year. This reflects more household consumption and less business consumption with people working at home due to Covid-19. Only the household consumption counts for this metric for this switch in where water is used.

One of our biggest challenges we face is customer perception and their understanding of the value of water, and in how we work with customers and other stakeholders to educate them on demand management and the benefits of water efficiency. Unfortunately, our mid-year performance, has been severely impacted by COVID-19, because customers are rightly using more water as they are at home more and there is enhanced focus on hygiene and hand washing.

Additional information

keyboard_arrow_right

Customers can compare our performance on the average amount of water used by each household each day against other companies in the industry here.

Customers can find out how our social contract initiatives are contributing to encouraging customers to reduce their water consumption here.

Further information on reducing water consumption, including on finding our more about our wide range of free water saving products, that could help customers save money, can be found here.

Percentage of satisfied vulnerable customers

keyboard_arrow_right
Mid-year actual:
n/a
Year-end target:
85%
Year-end target on track?
Yes

Definition

keyboard_arrow_right

The aim of this performance commitment is to ensure that those customers that are registered for our Priority Services Register (PSR) are satisfied with the services they receive through the PSR. It is measured via an annual survey; the percentage of customers satisfied is determined by a single question that asks customers to rate their satisfaction with the services they receive through the PSR. Customers who respond that they are ‘satisfied’ or ‘very satisfied’ will be counted toward the total.

Performance

keyboard_arrow_right

As this measure is based on annual data, a mid-year value is not applicable.

We provide a range of free services to support customers in vulnerable circumstances, such as large print bills, support to read a meter, or ensuring consistent supply for those who depend on water for medical equipment at home.

Additional information

keyboard_arrow_right

Customers can find further information on the services we offer as part of our Priority Services on our website here.

Customers can find out how our social contract initiatives are contributing to providing extra care services and debt advice here.

Priority services register

keyboard_arrow_right

Also known as:

Priority services for customers in vulnerable circumstances

Mid-year actual:
2.1%
Year-end target:
3.1%
Year-end target on track?
No

Definition

keyboard_arrow_right

The aim of this performance commitment is to ensure we increase the number of customers in vulnerable circumstances that receive the most appropriate service to their needs. These are customers added to our Priority Services Register (PSR). It is reported as the percentage of households that we supply that are registered on our PSR.

Performance

keyboard_arrow_right

We provide a range of free services to support customers in vulnerable circumstances, such as large print bills, support to read a meter, or ensuring consistent supply for those who depend on water for medical equipment at home.

When setting our targets we assumed that a planned national data share project would now be live, as it was planned to go ahead in 2020/21. This would have granted us data access to customers in vulnerable circumstances from other utility providers, as customers would only need to register with one company rather than all of those signed up to the project. This national project has however been put on hold and so achieving the target has become more challenging.

Over the last six months we have focused on promoting our Priority Services across our digital channels, as well as asking staff to mention and signpost it to customers whenever they have the opportunity. We have also partnered with Western Power Distribution and agreed a local data share.

Additional information

keyboard_arrow_right

Customers can find further information on the services we offer as part of our Priority Services on our website here.

Customers can find out how our social contract initiatives are contributing to providing extra care services and debt advice here.

Raw water quality

keyboard_arrow_right

Also known as:

Raw water quality of sources

Mid-year actual:
39 Kilograms of phosphorus loss reduction
Year-end target:
109 Kilograms of phosphorus loss reduction
Year-end target on track?
Yes

Definition

keyboard_arrow_right

A water catchment is an area of land through which water from any form of precipitation (such as rain, melting snow or ice) drains into a body of water (such as a river, lake or reservoir, or even into underground water supplies – ‘groundwater’). It could be a very large area, such as an estuary and any associated coastal waters. Or it could be relatively small – for example, the catchment of a tributary river.

As an assessment of our progress in implementing catchment management activities, the aim of this performance commitment is to reduce the level of nutrients lost to the environment. The level of nutrients is measured as the estimated kilograms of phosphorus saved from being lost to the environment. The assessment of progress against the target is made using a recognised model (Farmscoper).

Performance

keyboard_arrow_right

Due to our work this year to date with farmers in the catchments of our raw water sources, 39 kilogrammes of phosphorus per year will not be lost from the land into the water environment. This will contribute to our aim to maintain raw water quality in our sources, so that the water is easier to treat to a potable standard. It will also help to maintain our SSSIs in favourable conservation status and surrounding waterbodies in good ecological status or potential under the Water Framework Directive. Our contributions to this performance commitment helps to benefit wider society, by improving our wider natural capital.

Additional information

keyboard_arrow_right

Customers can find further information on our catchment management initiatives here.

River abstractions

keyboard_arrow_right

Also known as:

Abstraction Incentive Mechanism (AIM)

Mid-year actual:
AIM not triggered
Year-end target:
-186.1 Megalitres if AIM triggered
Year-end target on track?
Yes

Definition

keyboard_arrow_right

The abstraction incentive mechanism (AIM) has the objective of encouraging water companies to reduce the environmental impact of abstracting water at environmentally sensitive sites when water is scarce. The aim of this performance commitment is to reduce abstraction from the Shipton Moyne Group sites when flows or levels are below an agreed point otherwise known as a “trigger”. This trigger indicates that there is a heightened risk of environmental impact from abstraction in the year ahead and that measures should be taken to mitigate this risk. The AIM measure supplements the controls we already have in place under our abstraction licencing obligations to safeguard the environment.

Performance

keyboard_arrow_right

The AIM measure is triggered when groundwater levels on 1st April each year are less than 90.0 meters above ordinance datum (sea level). On 1 April 2020, the groundwater level was 97.767mAOD and thus AIM has not been triggered. This means the target is met.

We take the potential for low river flows and the potential damage this can have on the environment very seriously. We continue to prioritise other options for ensuring our customers have a sufficient supply of water, before abstraction is considered as a solution.

Supply interruptions

keyboard_arrow_right
Mid-year actual:
0:16:21 HH:MM:SS per property per year
Year-end target:
0:06:30 HH:MM:SS per property per year
Year-end target on track?
No

Definition

keyboard_arrow_right

The aim of this performance commitment is to minimise the number and duration of supply interruptions to customers. It is calculated as the average number of minutes lost per customer for the whole customer base for interruptions (planned and unplanned) that lasted three hours or more.

Performance

keyboard_arrow_right

We have extended our operational techniques to minimise supply interruptions to customers. These include rezoning from one discrete area of supply to another, on-demand supplies from bowsers, infusion tankering, overland connections and ‘live’ clamp repairs. The extent of the use of these techniques means that we no longer interrupt customers for more than three hours for any planned or warned interruption. We also use the techniques to limit the length of unplanned interruptions and to reduce the number of customers impacted.

Our performance this year has however been dominated by two large events. A burst on a 10” main on Rose Green Road, Royate Hill in Eastville and third-party damage to a 12” main in Yate which have resulted in 13 minutes 41 seconds (84% of the total to date).

We have also seen an increase in third-party damage events that have led to an increase in our supply interruptions performance, which have formed c50% of the minutes lost in the first half of the year.

Additional information

keyboard_arrow_right

Customers can compare our performance on supply interruptions against other companies in the industry here.

Total customer complaints

keyboard_arrow_right
Mid-year actual:
31.8 Complaints/ 10,000 connections
Year-end target:
87.3 Complaints/ 10,000 connections
Year-end target on track?
Yes

Definition

keyboard_arrow_right

The aim of this performance commitment is to deliver higher levels of customer service and in doing so reduce the total number of complaints made by household customers. It is measured as the total number of complaints by household customers we have received per 10,000 connections. Complaints include the combined total of unwanted contacts (i.e. telephone complaints), written complaints (letter and email) and contacts via new contact channels (such as webform, social media, webchat/ Livechat or short message service (SMS)). Complaints made via visits are also included.

Performance

keyboard_arrow_right

At Bristol Water we aim to provide the best possible service at all times. For all complaints we consider what action to take to put things right. We are pleased that despite the challenging environment due to COVID-19 we are on track to deliver a level of service that would be better than last year’s industry top quarter performance level. This is despite the fact that due to COVID-19 we had to stop all non-essential work in line with the government guidance.

Additional information

keyboard_arrow_right

Customers can compare our performance on written complaints against other companies in the industry here.

Turbidity at our treatment works

keyboard_arrow_right
Mid-year actual:
0 Treatment works
Year-end target:
0 Treatment works
Year-end target on track?
Yes

Definition

keyboard_arrow_right

Turbidity is a measure of the cloudiness of water, normally caused by suspended minerals. It is an important water quality control parameter at our water treatment works. Factors such as turbidity affect the effectiveness of disinfection. The aim of this performance commitment is to reduce the turbidity experienced at our water treatment works. It is measured as the number of operational potable water treatment works whose turbidity 95th percentile equals or exceeds a 0.5 NTU (Nephelometric Turbidity Units) threshold.

Performance

keyboard_arrow_right

This metric enables us to consider the following:

  • The use of turbidity as a measure to provide assurance of the optimal operation of filter performance, where filtration is used to address identified risks associated with chlorine resistant pathogens in the source water;
  • The impact of turbidity on the efficiency of disinfection processes;
  • The effect that turbidity has on the aesthetics of the treated water.

We have a long track record of achieving zero turbidity events and we are confident that this will continue into futures years as a result of our approach.

Additional information

keyboard_arrow_right

Customers can learn more about the issues that may affect your water quality here.

Unbilled properties

keyboard_arrow_right

Also known as:

Void properties

Mid-year actual:
2.01%
Year-end target:
1.90%
Year-end target on track?
Yes

Definition

keyboard_arrow_right

The aim of this performance commitment is to reduce the number of void properties (by identifying household properties that are occupied but not billed). A legitimately classified void property is a property within our supply area receiving water services but which does not receive a charge, as there are no occupants. It is measured as the number of household properties classified as void as a percentage of the total number of household properties supplied.

Performance

keyboard_arrow_right

Although the level of voids is higher than our year-end target, it reduced over the first half of the year from the 2.54% at the end of 2019/20. Therefore we forecast that with further reductions we can meet the target. The risk to our customers arising from a higher level of void properties is that these are at risk of being unknowingly occupied and therefore debt could be building. It is very important that we keep a close management on the void level to prevent this happening.

One method we have undertaken to reduce the number of voids is by performing ongoing checks of HM Land Registry, to establish whether our records of void properties align to the records of ownership of the registry. Another method is to conduct property visits. Although this activity cannot take place during the Covid-19 lockdowns, we will continue to undertake such visits when the level of restriction allows.

Unplanned outage

keyboard_arrow_right
Mid-year actual:
0.87%
Year-end target:
2.34%
Year-end target on track?
Yes

Definition

keyboard_arrow_right

The aim of this performance commitment is to ensure that our above-ground water assets are maintained and improved for the benefit of current and future generations. It is reported as the temporary loss of peak week production capacity (PWPC) in the reporting year weighted by the duration of the loss (in days).

Performance

keyboard_arrow_right

We are pleased to report that our outage level continues to remain low. Our high levels of service reflects our approach by responding immediately to unplanned outage failures - we aim to fix all outages within a working day. This means that unless there is a reason why the outage cannot be fixed that is outside of our control (for example due to the lead time required on parts to fix the outage or because of specific treatment process conditions) all outages are addressed before they exceed the 24 hour duration criteria.

Value for money

keyboard_arrow_right
Mid-year actual:
n/a
Year-end target:
80%
Year-end target on track?
Yes

Definition

keyboard_arrow_right

The aim of this performance commitment is to deliver a service that represents value for money for our customers. It is measured via an annual household customer tracking survey; the percentage of customers surveyed who consider that we provide good value for money is determined by customers either responding “very good” or “good”.

Performance

keyboard_arrow_right

As this measure is based on annual survey data, a mid-year value is not applicable. However, the increase in both our billing and operational C-MeX scores compared to last year would insinuate that customers feel they are getting an increased value for money, and therefore would result in us achieving a higher result than in previous years when the survey is conducted at the end of the year. We have also achieved an encouraging level of performance in the CCW Water Matters survey. The survey is a useful proxy method for our customers to understand our performance, as it includes a question on how far customers agreed that the water services they receive represents value for money.

Additional information

keyboard_arrow_right

Customers can find out more information on their water bill here.

Customers can compare our performance on value for money against other companies in the industry, via the CCW annual Water Matters survey here.

WINEP compliance

keyboard_arrow_right

Also known as:

Water industry national environment programme compliance

Mid-year actual:
100%
Year-end target:
100%
Year-end target on track?
Yes

Definition

keyboard_arrow_right

The Water Industry National Environment Programme (WINEP) represents a set of actions that the Environment Agency have requested we complete between 2020 and 2025, in order to contribute towards meeting our environmental obligations.

The aim of this performance commitment is to ensure that we deliver our agreed WINEP schemes in a timely manner. It is measured as the percentage of WINEP schemes completed each year measured against the programme agreed with the Environment Agency on 1 April 2019.

Performance

keyboard_arrow_right

There are 50 lines on the WINEP, which include: schemes, risk assessments, surveillance programmes, a biodiversity action plan and a feasibility study. As none of the WINEP schemes are due for completion in 2020/21 we are able to forecast that we will meet our target for this year.

Additional information

keyboard_arrow_right

Further information on the list of WINEP schemes is provided here.

WINEP delivery

keyboard_arrow_right

Also known as:

Delivery of water industry national environment programme requirements

Mid-year actual:
Met
Year-end target:
Met
Year-end target on track?
Yes

Definition

keyboard_arrow_right

The WINEP represents a set of actions that the Environment Agency have requested we complete between 2020 and 2025, in order to contribute towards meeting our environmental obligations.

The aim of this performance commitment is to ensure that we deliver our agreed WINEP schemes in a timely manner. It is measured by a confirmation of whether we have “met” or “not met” the requirements of the WINEP.

Performance

keyboard_arrow_right

There are 50 lines on the WINEP, which include: schemes, risk assessments, surveillance programmes, a biodiversity action plan and a feasibility study. As none of the WINEP schemes are due for completion in 2020/21 we are able to forecast that we will meet our target for this year.

Additional information

keyboard_arrow_right

Further information on the list of WINEP schemes is provided here.

Waste disposal compliance

keyboard_arrow_right
Mid-year actual:
98%
Year-end target:
100%
Year-end target on track?
No

Definition

keyboard_arrow_right

Trade effluent, if not controlled, can have harmful effects, which include harm to the environment, particularly our surrounding rivers, streams and estuaries. The aim of this performance commitment is to ensure we dispose of our trade effluent safely without posing a threat to human and environmental health. It is measured as the percentage of total trade effluent discharge samples that meet the consent requirements in the Environment Agency permits.

Performance

keyboard_arrow_right

There have been six non-compliant samples out of a total of 359 collected, with the samples being sourced from two sites: Blagdon fisheries and Barrow Treatment Works.

Our ability to report on full compliance has been significantly impacted since the introduction of a discharge consent (which came into force from 1 February 2018) at Blagdon fisheries (downstream of the trout rearing pens). Compliance for samples collected at the site has proved challenging ever since. This year four failures were reported between February and May at that site. One of these failures was a consequence of staff restrictions due to COVID-19, which led to a change in the operation of the rearing programme, which resulted in fish residing for longer in the holding pens. The subsequent deterioration in quality which lead to the ammonium compliance failure in May is understood to be a consequence of this change in operation.

In response to these challenges, additional control measures have been put into place since June 2020 to ensure representative samples could be collected consistently at the discharge point (at the outlet of the fish farm) and work has continued throughout the summer to improve water quality monitoring and install equipment which will reduce the likelihood of future non-compliance.

Even if the Blagdon fisheries consent was not included, extreme seasonal fluctuations in the quality of the water sources we use for treatment will always present a challenge in achieving our target of full compliance. We are however constantly reviewing the reasons for the small number of failures with a view of implementing remedial measures to drive our compliance figure higher.

close

Loading...

Also Known As:

Generating...

The content is loading.

The content you requested is loading, please wait...